Values audit · year 2089 · pre-encounter
The Transition changed everything — but it didn't settle the old arguments. It just made them stranger, faster, and higher-stakes. Substrate rights. Post-scarcity distribution. The right to remain unenhanced. Planetary governance vs. nation-state memory.
These are the tensions your generation will actually decide. Not abstractions — real forks in civilisational history. There are no correct answers here. There's only where you land.
// Unfamiliar terms are underlined — tap to define.
The six fault lines
Structurally identical to the Year 10 politics version — same six tension axes, same scoring system, same results format. The content has been transposed to near-future dilemmas (AI governance, cognitive enhancement, post-scarcity economics, substrate rights) which map directly onto contemporary political tensions. Use for speculative ethics units, philosophy of technology, dystopian literature contexts, or as a thought-experiment counterpart to the contemporary version. Results are printable; nothing is stored or transmitted.
Keyboard: 1 2 3 to choose · ← back.
Press 1 2 3 to select · ← back
Cognition map · output
The instrument above mapped where you stand.
The one below tests what that means.
The interesting part isn't where you landed — it's why, and where you'd cross the line and switch.
The strongest arguments against your position — stated by someone who genuinely holds them. What would you say?
Not labels for you. Views that exist in the world — see which overlap with your leanings and which you'd push back on.