DSP Prague · Themenfeld 3 · Politics, Culture, Society: UK
An archive instrument

Who Gets
to Keep It?

British museums hold millions of objects. Many were acquired during the period of colonial rule.

Some of the countries they came from are asking for them back.

The museums have largely said no.

This instrument looks at four objects. It does not tell you what to think about them.

Stage 1 — The objects

Four things.
Currently in British museums.

For each object: what it is, how it arrived, where it is now, and what is being asked. Read the facts. Consider the question. There are no correct answers here — yet.

Object 01
The Benin Bronzes
Kingdom of Benin — present-day Nigeria
↳ Acquired: 1897 · Punitive expedition · British forces looted the Royal Palace of Benin following a military operation. Approximately 3,000 objects removed.
↳ Currently: British Museum, London · Also: museums across Europe and the United States.
↳ Return requested: Nigeria · Formally and repeatedly since the 1970s.
↳ British Museum response: Cannot legally deaccession objects under the British Museum Act 1963. Has offered loans.
Benin Bronze, British Museum
Benin Bronze · British Museum · Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA

The Benin Bronzes are among the most significant works of African art in existence — brass plaques and sculptures created by royal craftsmen of the Edo people from the 13th century onward. They were not traded or gifted. They were taken during a British military expedition mounted after the killing of a British diplomatic party. The objects were subsequently sold to museums and private collectors across Europe. Many are still there.

In 2022, Germany began returning Benin Bronzes to Nigeria. The Smithsonian in the United States also began returning objects. The British Museum, governed by an Act of Parliament, says it cannot legally do the same.

If an object was made by one people, taken by force by another, and is now held in a third country's institution — who does it belong to?
Object 02
The Elgin Marbles
Parthenon, Athens — Greece
↳ Acquired: 1801–1812 · Lord Elgin, British Ambassador · Removed from the Parthenon under contested permission from Ottoman authorities then occupying Greece.
↳ Currently: British Museum, London · The remainder of the frieze is in the Acropolis Museum, Athens.
↳ Return requested: Greece · Consistently since 1983. A purpose-built museum in Athens has space prepared for them.
↳ British Museum response: Objects were legally acquired. The British Museum provides wider access. Splitting the collection would damage its integrity.
Elgin Marbles, British Museum
Parthenon Sculptures · British Museum · Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA

The Parthenon sculptures were part of a building completed in 432 BC. They depict the Panathenaic procession — a civic and religious celebration central to Athenian identity. Half are in London. Half are in Athens. The two halves cannot be displayed together.

The British Museum argues the marbles were legally acquired and are better preserved in London. Greece argues they were taken under colonial conditions and belong with the building they came from. The Greek government has called their removal an act of vandalism.

Does it matter that the object was part of a building — that removing it changed what remained?
Object 03
The Koh-i-Noor Diamond
Punjab — present-day Pakistan/India
↳ Acquired: 1849 · Treaty of Lahore · Signed when the last Sikh ruler was ten years old, under British military occupation of the Punjab.
↳ Currently: Tower of London · Set in the crown of Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother. Displayed as part of the Crown Jewels.
↳ Return requested: India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran have all made claims.
↳ UK Government response: The stone was "legally" ceded under the Treaty of Lahore. No plans to return it.
Koh-i-Noor Diamond
Koh-i-Noor Diamond · Crown Jewels · Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA

The Koh-i-Noor — meaning "Mountain of Light" — is one of the largest cut diamonds in the world. It has been part of the British Crown Jewels since 1849. It is worn by British queens at coronations. It is among the most visited objects in the Tower of London.

The treaty under which it was ceded was signed by a ten-year-old under military occupation. Multiple countries claim it as part of their national heritage. The British government argues it was legally transferred and that returning it would set a precedent for the return of other objects.

The British government says returning it would "set a precedent." What does that argument reveal about how they think about the other objects?
Object 04
The Rosetta Stone
Rashid (Rosetta) — Egypt
↳ Acquired: 1801 · Captured from French forces following the Battle of the Nile. Egypt was under French then British military occupation.
↳ Currently: British Museum, London · The most visited object in the museum.
↳ Return requested: Egypt · Zahi Hawass, former Egyptian Minister of Antiquities, has campaigned for its return for decades.
↳ British Museum response: The stone was captured legitimately as a spoil of war. It is "a document of world culture" best housed in a universal museum.
Rosetta Stone, British Museum
Rosetta Stone · British Museum · Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA

The Rosetta Stone was created in 196 BC under Ptolemaic rule in Egypt. It is inscribed in three scripts — Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics, Demotic, and Ancient Greek — and was key to deciphering hieroglyphics. It is Egyptian in origin, captured by the French, then taken by the British.

The British Museum describes it as part of "world culture" and argues that a universal museum in London serves more people than a national museum in Cairo. Egypt argues it was taken under colonial conditions and belongs to the people whose ancestors created it.

The British Museum calls itself a "universal museum." Who gave it that authority — and who benefits from that description?
Stage 2 — The arguments

The positions.

The debate about restitution has been running for decades. These are the main positions. None of them are stupid. All of them have consequences.

The case for keeping
The Universal Museum
Access. Major museums in London attract millions of visitors annually, including people who could not afford to travel to source countries. The objects are seen by more people in London than they would be in Cairo, Lagos, or Athens.
Conservation. British institutions have the resources to preserve objects that might deteriorate or be damaged elsewhere. The objects are protected.
Context. Placing objects from many cultures together in one institution allows visitors to see connections and comparisons impossible in a single-nation museum.
Legal ownership. The objects were acquired under the law that existed at the time. Retroactively applying today's moral standards to past acquisitions is problematic. Where does it end?
Precedent. If the British Museum returns the Benin Bronzes, it may be legally and morally obligated to return thousands of other objects. The museum as an institution could not survive that process.
The case for return
Restitution
Provenance. Many objects were taken by force during military operations, under colonial occupation, or through treaties signed under duress. "Legal at the time" does not mean consensual.
Cultural continuity. These objects are not simply aesthetic artefacts — they are part of living cultural traditions, religious practices, and national identities. Their absence is an ongoing wound.
Sovereignty. Former colonies now have functioning governments, institutions, and museums. The argument that they cannot care for their own heritage is paternalistic.
The "universal museum" argument. The institutions that call themselves universal were built during the period of empire. Their universalism was not neutral — it reflected a particular political order.
Precedent again. Germany returned Benin Bronzes in 2022. The Smithsonian followed. The precedent is already being set — the question is whether Britain joins it.
Dan Hicks — The Brutish Museums (2020)

"The museum is not a neutral space. It is a continuation of colonial power by other means."

Hicks argues that the debate about restitution misses the deeper point. The question is not simply whether individual objects should be returned. The question is what the museum as an institution represents — who built it, what it took to build it, and whose story it tells. The objects in the glass cases are not merely old things. They are evidence of a history that is still ongoing.

Your position — before the final screen

Having looked at four objects and read the arguments — where do you stand? And what is the strongest argument against your position?

Stage 3 — The strand

Pull back.

Seven instruments. Seven encounters with the same problem.

Look at the sequence.

01
Who Gets to Leave?
Political authority
02
British Invasion
Cultural credit
03
Whose Story Is This?
Narrative meaning
04
Bassline Britain
Whose contribution gets counted
05
How British Is It?
National identity
06
Who Invented England?
Historical myth
07
Who Gets to Keep It?
The physical evidence
Benin Bronze, British Museum
Benin Bronze
Kingdom of Benin — Nigeria
Created 13th–19th century
Acquired 1897 · Punitive expedition
Current location British Museum · London
Return requested Yes · Since 1970s
Museum response Cannot deaccession under UK law
Status Unresolved · 2026